Regular vs. Headless - Printable Version +- OpenMarine (https://forum.openmarine.net) +-- Forum: OpenPlotter (https://forum.openmarine.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: General discussion (https://forum.openmarine.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Regular vs. Headless (/showthread.php?tid=2215) |
Regular vs. Headless - kwsherwood - 2020-01-07 I'm learning and configuring Openplotter on R PI 4 for eventual use in small, trailerable sailboat. GPS puck - check. Open CPN - check. VNC access via phone/tablet - check. At this point, it's not clear whether I'll want to get a small display to mount or be satisfied with remote access over wifi. Auto boot is working so that I can power up the current installation without needing monitor, keyboard, mouse. Question: Is there an advantage to running the headless build versus regular? I'm imagining that the desktop environment expends some energy, even when screensaver kicks in or HDMI monitor is powered down. I don't see much system load so far in testing; temp is 48 - 50 C. Current draw is averaging .83 amp. Seems like I'd appreciate the flexibility of having the full environment running from time to time -- but maybe I'm missing something of the tradeoff? Thanks for advice. Ken Sherwood Regular vs. Headless - abarrow - 2020-01-07 I use both. I have a monitor at the nav station, and a tablet running VNC. I find that I more frequently use OpenCPN on the tablet directly, and just use OP to generate a NMEA stream that OpenCPN on the tablet listens to. Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk |