This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ver 3.x I2C connections.
#4
(2023-06-14, 04:07 PM)amckeown Wrote: Thanks very much. heading to the boat today and will try the setup again.
when I start the i2c routine, every button is non responsive. the chip is getting power, as the led lights up.

I've inserted the last system check i did. may be of use.
Alan

Alan

That page is unresponsive because you haven't actioned the message at the bottom of the page. It requires you to grant permission.

This borne out by the results of your system check:

Checking I2C sensors... | I2C enabled | openplotter-i2c-read not running
↳The access request must be aproved with read/write permission in Signal K administrator.


Follow my steps to address that.

What I would say is be absolutely sure which sensors you have, are they BME280 or BMP280? If you try to set it up and pick the wrong one it won't work. Many sellers send out BMP280 when the buyer actually wants a BME280, they look so similar. Often the boards carry both E and P markings.

Have a look at yours, there is a small metal can on the PCB with a small hole in; is the can roughly square or is it clearly a non-square rectangle? Another clue but one which is a little less reliable is if the i2cdetect command shows an address of 0x77 in which case it is probably a BME280. BMP280s are normally 0x76. The shape of the can is the truer test.

I've done a test today with a BME280 and can let you have the results of that if you need it. It is almost identical to that for the BMP. If it is a BME then under Supported sensors you'd pick BME280 of course and you'd have three lines in the I2C screen, the additional one being for relative humidity.


Attached Files Image(s)
   
Reply


Messages In This Thread
ver 3.x I2C connections. - by amckeown - 2023-06-13, 08:54 PM
RE: ver 3.x I2C connections. - by baltika_no_9 - 2023-06-13, 11:59 PM
RE: ver 3.x I2C connections. - by ChDel - 2024-01-30, 11:29 AM
RE: ver 3.x I2C connections. - by amckeown - 2023-06-14, 04:07 PM
RE: ver 3.x I2C connections. - by baltika_no_9 - 2023-06-14, 04:52 PM
RE: ver 3.x I2C connections. - by amckeown - 2023-06-14, 11:10 PM
RE: ver 3.x I2C connections. - by amckeown - 2023-06-15, 02:06 PM
RE: ver 3.x I2C connections. - by baltika_no_9 - 2023-06-15, 05:25 AM
RE: ver 3.x I2C connections. - by baltika_no_9 - 2023-06-15, 03:23 PM
RE: ver 3.x I2C connections. - by amckeown - 2023-06-16, 02:10 AM
RE: ver 3.x I2C connections. - by baltika_no_9 - 2023-06-16, 08:21 AM
RE: ver 3.x I2C connections. - by amckeown - 2023-06-20, 04:15 PM
RE: ver 3.x I2C connections. - by amckeown - 2023-06-16, 01:38 PM
RE: ver 3.x I2C connections. - by baltika_no_9 - 2023-06-16, 03:06 PM
RE: ver 3.x I2C connections. - by amckeown - 2023-06-16, 04:40 PM
RE: ver 3.x I2C connections. - by baltika_no_9 - 2023-06-19, 10:27 AM
RE: ver 3.x I2C connections. - by baltika_no_9 - 2023-06-20, 04:54 PM
RE: ver 3.x I2C connections. - by baltika_no_9 - 2024-02-01, 01:28 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)