This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
linear actuator recomendations
#39
Any unit you can backdrive means it has lower friction and thus higher efficiency. If this is the case, then they do need a brake (reverse clutch) to fully realize this potential so they can hold position which pypilot does not really fully support. This would complicate things but the efficiency gains of ball screws are potentially large.

Electric motors are most efficient with lighter loads that only reduce free running speed by 10% or so. So this "hurd" actuator may well be more efficient at much lighter loads? Did you try 3 or 5kg? It seems strange that it cannot even move half its rating (Unless it expects 24 volts or something), but in general ball screws are significantly more efficient but would need software support and a brake to fully realize it, especially if there is significant weather helm.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
linear actuator recomendations - by ddelorme - 2018-11-29, 07:22 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by Didier B - 2018-12-05, 11:26 AM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by hartswood - 2018-12-02, 05:41 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by hartswood - 2018-12-02, 07:23 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by hartswood - 2018-12-02, 11:14 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by hartswood - 2018-12-05, 12:04 AM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by ddelorme - 2018-12-05, 01:39 AM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by MikeNT - 2020-02-05, 11:34 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by ddelorme - 2020-02-06, 12:12 AM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by MikeNT - 2020-02-06, 01:06 AM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by rastam4n - 2021-01-17, 03:45 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by Andreas29 - 2021-01-19, 09:11 AM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by rastam4n - 2021-01-19, 02:53 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by Andreas29 - 2021-01-28, 12:19 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by Andreas29 - 2021-01-29, 09:14 AM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by PaddyB - 2021-08-31, 01:34 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by rastam4n - 2021-01-29, 09:36 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by Andreas29 - 2021-01-30, 05:59 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by Andreas29 - 2021-01-30, 09:17 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by yannbis - 2021-03-16, 05:59 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by yannbis - 2021-03-19, 03:21 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by lavioleta - 2021-04-22, 08:03 AM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by yannbis - 2021-04-22, 10:14 AM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by yannbis - 2021-08-27, 12:11 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by Max1947 - 2021-08-27, 02:24 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by Onno - 2021-08-28, 08:07 AM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by Onno - 2021-08-29, 12:38 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by seandepagnier - 2021-08-29, 01:40 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by laurent - 2021-09-05, 06:01 PM
RE: linear actuator recomendations - by yannbis - 2022-08-30, 03:39 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)