This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Graphing with node red and signalK
#37
The TX+ line goes to RX+ on the converter, the TX- goes to ground on the converter. Since the talker's output on TX- is grounded, it has to be to ground on the converter with the converter's RX- left floating.
In my case, the talker is a Raymarine E80 chart plotter, which seems quite popular. It uses RX+/RX-/TX+/TX- nomenclature but should use data/ground nomenclature instead. The E80 NMEA0183 end is optically isolated but the inexpensive converter from China to go to USB is not optically isolated. The RX- and TX- lines from the E80 need to go to the ground pin on the converter.

For those that are curious for the technical reasons, the converter input chips sense the differential between RX+ and RX-. Since RX- leads to ground on the E80, it effectively is grounded. The RX+ line of the converter then moves between zero volts and some positive voltage (around 8V in my case). The receiver chip can sense the differential between zero and 8V but can not properly decode the second state where both lines are zero. If the RX- end is left floating, it moves to +5V so the input chip sees 8V-5V or 3V in one state and 0V-5V or -5V in the second state.

I hope that makes sense ....
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-05-25, 01:35 AM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by kste - 2017-05-25, 05:35 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-05-26, 11:49 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-05-29, 09:57 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-05-30, 05:53 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-05-30, 06:09 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-05-30, 07:38 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-05-31, 06:33 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-05-31, 08:30 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-05-31, 10:11 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-06-01, 04:41 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-06-01, 09:25 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-06-01, 10:56 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-06-02, 08:28 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-06-05, 07:52 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-06-06, 06:57 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-06-07, 03:30 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-06-10, 05:57 AM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-06-25, 06:01 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-06-29, 02:49 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-07-07, 05:55 PM
RE: Graphing with node red and signalK - by JD1 - 2017-07-07, 06:33 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)