2020-06-17, 11:15 AM
The truth is that Raspi-OS 64 seems to work better and feels more stable than the 32 version. And it is surprising considering that being a beta version it is still missing quite a few of the tweaks Raspbian has received.
I'm using it with openplotter and I like its performance more. And I haven't been able to make pypilot work at all. Although it installs apparently well, the thing is that the compass calibration tool does not work. It's wrong to build. It says something about libwiringpi like the file is not compatible and ends up getting stuck.
Still, even without using the IMU I like more how stable it is running services in the background, especially Signal k and its connections to infulxDB and Grafana. And that's why I use it on an Rpi 4 with 2 Gb of RAM that in principle should not benefit from the use of a 64-bit system. In my opinion Raspi-OS 64-bit communicates more effectively with the 64 kernel and the 64 CPU and GPU and is therefore more fluid and stable.
So... yes. I'm sailing Raspi-OS 64 despite being a beta and missing some features.
I'm using it with openplotter and I like its performance more. And I haven't been able to make pypilot work at all. Although it installs apparently well, the thing is that the compass calibration tool does not work. It's wrong to build. It says something about libwiringpi like the file is not compatible and ends up getting stuck.
Still, even without using the IMU I like more how stable it is running services in the background, especially Signal k and its connections to infulxDB and Grafana. And that's why I use it on an Rpi 4 with 2 Gb of RAM that in principle should not benefit from the use of a 64-bit system. In my opinion Raspi-OS 64-bit communicates more effectively with the 64 kernel and the 64 CPU and GPU and is therefore more fluid and stable.
So... yes. I'm sailing Raspi-OS 64 despite being a beta and missing some features.