This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Marine Anemometer Project
#11
I see most production Anemometers and Yachta use a forward leaning post... usually around 14".  A couple just use a vertical post.  I'm leaning toward a vertical post for some structural, weight and aerodynamic reasons.   Is there some advantage to these forward leaning versions?

Thanks.
Reply
#12
(2024-02-19, 09:11 PM)Inq Wrote: I see most production Anemometers and Yachta use a forward leaning post... usually around 14".  A couple just use a vertical post.  I'm leaning toward a vertical post for some structural, weight and aerodynamic reasons.   Is there some advantage to these forward leaning versions?

Thanks.

These are my opinions:
- it is usually on the top of the mast where realestate is limited and there is a whip antenna and regular Windex, pushing it forward and outwards helps with its foot print.
- additionally, it makes calibration easier as you can line up the shaft with the front of the boat easier if you have a lever arm or bigger target to use a "viewfinder"
Reply
#13
(2024-02-19, 09:20 PM)Techstyle Wrote:
(2024-02-19, 09:11 PM)Inq Wrote: I see most production Anemometers and Yachta use a forward leaning post... usually around 14".  A couple just use a vertical post.  I'm leaning toward a vertical post for some structural, weight and aerodynamic reasons.   Is there some advantage to these forward leaning versions?

Thanks.

These are my opinions:
- it is usually on the top of the mast where realestate is limited and there is a whip antenna and regular Windex, pushing it forward and outwards helps with its foot print.
- additionally, it makes calibration easier as you can line up the shaft with the front of the boat easier if you have a lever arm or bigger target to use a "viewfinder"

Thanks... That makes perfect sense.  I have nothing up there... but just remembered... 
I have a rotating mast. CRAP! - That sure throws a monkey wrench into the works.
Reply
#14
(2024-02-18, 10:15 AM)wiktorsam Wrote: And what about yachta wind sensor? https://open-boat-projects.org/en/windsensor-yachta/ the only change I made was replacing the bearings with ceramic ones.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/JpHgi5PBL4VCE6NP9
https://photos.app.goo.gl/nabaghSC2iDRTCCSA

+1 for Yachta. I have used it for two seasons now and it works great. Simple integration into signalK on the RPI and displayed via KIP dashboard.
Reply
#15
Two more installments, but nothing Earth Shattering - (1) Change sensor chip (2) First cut of the speed sensor portion.

Contents/Intro Page - https://inqonthat.com/aiming-for-a-20-ma...nemometer/
Reply
#16
It's been a while.  The weather hasn't been very helpful and had several bugs to kill in the software, but here are some test results from the Test article. - https://inqonthat.com/inqwind-plastic-be...periments/
Reply
#17
Current Design Thought
  1. Electronics totally sealed in plastic. Weatherproof but unserviceable
  2. Bearing can't be 100% protected, but convoluted, up-hill path for water ingress with drainage.
  3. Striving for accurate readings as low as 1 knot
  4. Less than 0.1 knot resolution
  5. Less than 0.1° direction resolution
  6. Configurable rate up to 100 Hz on both angle and speed
  7. Less than 25 millisecond latency
  8. < $20US per unit
   
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)